Search This Blog

Sunday, September 19, 2010

African-American Foreclosure Policy Florida

Proposed Rule Of Law Based Upon Practices In Florida Rocket Docket Foreclosures related to Black litigants.

Rule 1.2 African-American Foreclosure policy
(a) No black shall present to the court any evidence of fraud in respect to perjured signatures or notary attestations on any document presented by the plaintiff.
(b) No black shall be allowed to rescind any mortgage under TILA if the said black admitted in his/her answer they owed the debt, even if said black claims they were induced by acts of bait and switch at 8:30pm in their home.
(c) No black shall be permitted to speak in court if they are pro se unless they file a notice of appearance and agree not to bring a court reporter to hearings.
(d) No black shall file a motion and ask for a hearing from the judicial assistant, he/she must come in the back door of the courthouse, stick their hand through a hole in the wall, and present a signed, notarized, written request to the senior judge asking permission to ride the back of the bus and thus qualify to have a hearing date set.
(e) No black shall appeal any final orders by any white judge unless said black hires a white attorney who is trying to make a buck, and all such appeals must first be approved by the KKK chief judge of the instant circuit.
(f) No black shall claim in any court that MERS has no authority to assign their promissory note. All blacks are to understand that MERS is a private company created by government instituted agencies and can put all African-Americans in chains if they so make assignment signed by Scott Anderson.
(g) No black shall challenge anything MERS does in regard to their mortgage or note. Blacks agree to give up the right to challenge MERS for the great honor to live in the USA and in the great state of Florida.
(h) No black shall stay in their home while they fight for fairness in Florida courts. If they desire fairness in Florida courts they must move out and live on the streets to prove they are legitimate and worthy litigants. All judges shall then consider these blacks not to have taken advantage of the house in which they live, which belongs to the First Bank of Fraud (FBF), even though FBF has not had an order of repossession. Any black who lives in said house for free must come into court wearing a white patch signifying “illegal squatter.”
(i) Any black that expects any judge in Florida in the rocket docket court system to follow the rule of law shall have a statute of liberty wearing a white sheet burned in the front yard, tarred and feathered, and told to go back to Africa: that in America no black can expect law to govern the courts and big banks.
(j) Any black who dares to petition the Florida Supreme Court to make any judge follow the rule of law, shall be worthy of eviction, cancellation of food stamps and medicaid, barred from Salvation Army shelters, and his/her children cast out to the streets. Any black that disagrees with this section shall have all other rights as a US citizen revoked.
(k) All black property owners who comply with this section shall be granted life, liberty, and justice all the days of their lives in this great state of Florida and all white judges shall then sing: “Way Down Upon The Suwannee River” as the Florida National Guard gives a 21 gun salute..
(l) This section shall be law because there is no law that says these precepts are unjust and unfair.

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Court Scams In Florida

The court scams in Florida have reached virus proportions.  The entire justice system is infected. From the circuit court to the appeals courts, the scams are shocking.  Judges are refusing to all evidence into the proceedings. They refuse to rule according to law. They are inventing all manner of tricks and methods to deny defendants their constitutional rights. They are inventing new interpretations of law and contracts. All of this is for one purpose: to throw people out of their homes and return these properties to racketeering banks and plaintiffs. The fraudulent documents being created is shocking. But judges are showing their black robe is nothing more than a dirty KKK robe. While the KKK openly hates blacks and Jews, these men in black robes openly hate defendants and the lawyers representing defendants. You often hear a racist say: "why I have friends who are black and Jewish."  And these judges will come out and say: "well I have friends who have been foreclosed and lawyer buddies too."

The court scams in Florida is the result of judges who are perverted in the first place. If we was to put a tail on these people we might catch them smoking crack or snorting coke. These are the same people who play with whores and prostitutes right in the court house. Would we really think these men who attend church from time to time would dare think they were living examples of hypocrites?

I am sure that in time, the foreclosure courts will eventually return back to a normal docket. But when they do, the rule of law will be long destroyed in these courts of shame. And when these judges die, how will they ever right the thousands they sinned against?  The foreclosed owners may lose in these sham courts but rest assured these judges will not be winners in the highest court of all.

Florida courts are a sham, because most Florida judges are a sham.

If there is a judge who is not a shyster, then let him stand up and take his peers to task. Silence may be golden but it is also YELLOW!

I think it is time for judges to break the code of silence and show us there are some real men under those black robes who are not yellow.

Yes, I am a little angry, can't you tell?

Lit Gant

Thursday, September 16, 2010

MERS IS NOT A MORTGAGEE OF RECORD

MERS claims it is a mortgagee of record when named by a lender to be its nominee on the mortgage. A very important legal question now arises.

If the mortgage follows the note, and if MERS assigns the mortgage to a person who does not have possession of the note, then MERS separates the mortgage from the note.

Now if MERS never has an interest in the note which it claims on its web site, then how can it be a mortgagee of record? How can MERS have interest in the mortgage as nominee but it has no interest in the note?

Obviously, what we need are judges who will look at this, look at the orignal or copy of a note, and then rule that the only party of interest in the note is the one named on it. This means, he must dismiss the complaint with prejudice against the present plaintiff. The plaintiff can then sell the note and mortgage to someone else. And they can go back and try to perfect the chain of assignment from the original Lender to themselves, come back to court and go at it again with the defendants.

The defendants would be wise, to contact the original lender and get a notarized letter stating they have no interest in the mortgage or note that it had been sold off.  Then file this in the public records at the court house. Then go file a quiet title before some other discount loan shark comes knocking to initiate another foreclosure.

Well, we gotta beat the racketeering mob of MERS and these banks somehow...

Lit Gant

Stop Foreclosure Fraud

Florida Chief Judges of Circuits

Is it true that the Chief Judges in the Judicial Circuits have had meetings wherein it has been discussed Pro Se litigants in foreclosure cases?

And have these Chief Judges in these meetings been advised how to handle lawyers representing foreclosure litigants?

And have these Chief Judges been informed to use "procedural" arguments to block motions to dismiss?

Pro Se Litigant: Your honor this complaint should be dismissed because the plaintiff has no standing. They admit in pleadings they did not have my original note or mortgage when the complaint was filed. I move this complaint be dismissed.

Attorney for the Plaintiff: Your honor we have attached to the complaint a copy of the note and mortgage. We do not have to supply the original until summary judgment. The plaintiff moves to deny this motion.

JUDGE: to the Pro Se defendant: You are arguing about procedure. I am going to deny your motion
_______________________
Another case

Pro Se Litigant: Your honor my motion addresses the fraudulent Assignment of mortgage by MERS. MERS has no standing to assign my note. They may be nominee for the mortgage but not for the note. Therefore, the use of the Assignment to transfer my note into a securtized trust after the trust is closed is not legal. I move to strike this assignment.

Attorney for the plaintiff: Your honor our response is the assignment is valid. The mortgage follows the note, and since we have the original mortgage and note now in our possession, the pleading of the defendant has no merit.

JUDGE: To the Pro Se defendant: What you are arguing here is procedural. I am not going to grant your motion to strike.

Pro Se Litigant: Your honor may I add something else?

JUDGE: What is it?

Pro Se Litigant: your honor this assignment I seek to strike was created on February 3, 2009. It was not introduced into the record until July 8, 2010.  Your honor, the plaintiff has since February 3, 2009 obtained another assignment from MERS dated June 4, 2010 into the name of another party said to be the successor by merger of the plaintiff. This renders the first assignment invalid and why I am pleading it be stricken.

JUDGE: Your argument is procedural. Motion still denied. I will not have pleadings in this court merely for the purpose of delaying the foreclosure. You borrowed the money, you owe the debt, I do not care who the lender is or who has the note, I am going to clear my docket and yours is one of them.
_________________

Here is what was reported on tampabay.com on October 19, 2009:

"He said foreclosure cases are rarely dismissed, and lawyers who use the tactic have little chance of succeeding. Even if the lender's case is thrown out, they almost always refile. "It's just a stall," McGrady said."

McGrady is the Chief Judge of the Pinellas county circuit.

"The judge went further. While appreciating that lawyers need to make a buck, he recommended most home owners NOT hire an expensive defense attorney if their goal is simply to postpone repossession of their house. The calendar is so jammed that many people wouldn't be thrown out of their homes for more than a year after they stopped paying their mortgage."

It is a shocking statement that lawyers are just trying to make a buck from desperate defendants.  And it is shocking these judges are not following the rule of law. Where is the Florida Bar?  Oh they must be enjoying another swill party where crack is passed around freely from mortgage lenders. Or where is the Florida Supreme Court in all this injustice?  Can it be they have turned lady justice into a harlot selling her out to banks and lenders to help revive a sagging economy in recession?

Justice in Florida is a joke.

My respect to the lawyers defending against this corruption.

Lit Gant

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Judicial Fraud In Pinellas County Court


Judge Pamela Campbell
 Was Pamela Campbell just paying back a former intern at an August 19, 2010 hearing on a motion for summary judgment, or was this a favor for past favors?  Here is the scoop from the floor of the court room.

Paul C. Hoffman a defendant in foreclosure in Pinellas County had represented himself Pro Se. He was trying to work out a mortgage modification when to his surprise he learned a hearing was scheduled for a summary judgment.  He knew he was out of time and the rocket docket in Pinellas County would soon litigate him (beat him up), and cast him out to the glee of corrupt lenders and Wall Street fat cats. So, he hired Mark Stopa a well respected foreclose attorney to represent him at the hearing.

On the morning of the hearing at about 8:15am, associate attorney Philip Healy went to the court house to review the case file to be prepared for the hearing to take place at 9:30am.  In the court file he found already sealed and conformed copies of the final judgment of foreclosure.  Now mind you this is at 8:15 and already in the court file and the staff at Judge Pamela Campbell's court are not on duty until 8am.  So, you can see the summary judgment had to be already signed either the day before or several days before. The only way to know is to put the staff and the judge under oath. But who dare think of it short of judicial punishment by her replacement to avenge or requite her?

This is a case where a Pro Se defendant had his legal rights raped and violated. Now you would think the supreme chief pontiff, Judge Thomas McGrady, would come out of his den in his black robe and send Mrs Campbell home with pay pending an investigation. But no, he would not, because he already had an ax to grind with Mark Stopa because he was filing motions to slow down or stop foreclosure lawsuits. Mr. pontiff does not want defendants to have just justice in his kingdom. He wants these foreclosures to rocket through the docket and out to the court house steps as quick as possible. It is possible he believes in doing this he is exciting the recovery of the economy by putting houses back on the market. And in addition, it appears he really hates Pro Se defendants like they do over in Hillsborough County. The ex-parte beer parties where they share kingdom stories about defendant motions stinks.

Mr. Hoffman has asked for Pamela Campbell to be disqualified from his case. She needs her license to practice law revoked. But short of first degree murder of a defendant that will never happen by the Florida Bar.  We would think the Governor would strip her of her appointed position and send her robe to the Goodwill box to be used for cleanup of the next oil spill. Or the Florida Bar would begin hearings to determine the sanctions she should receive. Sanctions? When is the last time a judge got his/her hands slapped in Florida?

Every Pro Se case that went before this judge in the past year should be thrown out. Any and all Pro Se defendants, even if there has been a court sale, should contact Mr. Stopa or Matt Weidner and have all this set aside. You can win even against the corrupt judges in Pinellas County Florida.

Judicial fraud will continue in Pinellas County Florida because the supreme pontiff himself needs to go and until then those controlling justice will be no more than street thugs with black robes and a hammer.  Every elected judge in this county needs fired at the election box. Send them back to chase ambulances and or whine to those hurt in nursing homes to call them.

Go Mr. Hoffman..

Go Mark Stopa....

Go Philip Healy....

Defenders of justice for the little people, go out and fight!

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

File Complaints Against Florida Notaries

Florida Notaries who notarize fraudulent assignments and other documents should not be allowed do this criminal behavior and not be held accountable.

The complaint form is here: http://www.flgov.com/notary

The correct address is:

Department of State
Notary Commissions and Certifications Section
Attn: Heather Slager
The Capitol, Room 209
400 South Monroe Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399

Also, send for copies of their notary applications (cost $6.50) for each person who was a notary. Then check their signature against that on the assignments and other documents. Many of these people are making scribbles on these documents and they are false.

It is time to put these people in jail.

Litgant